My approach is to try to assess how the U. S. is doing, relative to the other developed democratic countries. The premise for the analysis is that the great transformation of the world economy over the last 30 years (documented by Nobel laureate economist A. Michael Spence) has generated a difficult set of problems that no individual or country has solved. There is in this new transformed economy increased global competition as labor in Asia and the developing world displaces the middle class and high-paying manufacturing jobs in Europe and the U.S., leading to high unemployment levels and the concomitant spending increases.
The present crisis generates a similar set of problems, though even more consequential for the U.S., because the world is more connected now, with China and India leading the transformation. The problem for the U.S. is further complicated by the world economy counting on U.S. military might to keep oil flowing around the globe and to bring stability to the Middle East, among other duties. Given this daunting set of problems, how is the U.S. doing economically, relative to the rest of the developed world?
Even with the possible exception of Germany, one cannot credibly claim that the U.S. economic response to the recession compares unfavorably to other advanced democracies. All of which raises a logical question: How could a broken, gridlocked, dysfunctional government come out so well when compared to other countries?
Yet this is not the narrative one hears discussed—on either side of the Atlantic.
It may not be perfect, but who’s doing better? Just sayin…
By Kevin Cullen GLOBE STAFF JANUARY 27, 2015
I don’t see the point of writing this column because no one is going to read it. The world is about to end. I saw it on the news.
I was talking to the mayor, Marty Walsh, about the storm and he seemed positively sanguine about the situation.
“Marty,” says I, “it’s the apocalypse. I just saw it on TV.”
Boston’s mayor responded with some tripe about using common sense and common courtesy and we’ll get through this, and I’m thinking, “What’s got into this guy?” Keeping his head when everyone around him is losing theirs? I’m very worried about Marty.
This is Charlie Baker’s first ride at the snow rodeo as governor and he was steely calm when he showed up at the bunker in Framingham Monday afternoon. He’s ditched his predecessor’s MEMA fleece in favor of a suit, a sturdy raft of placidity in a sea of panic. What fun is that? He’s as bad as Marty.
The governor actually had the audacity to point out that it snows around here and sometimes it snows a lot. He obviously didn’t get the memo. This is no time for levelheadedness.
And it all will melt. Just sayin….
Okay. The Hyperloop, in essence, has two parts: the neotransistometer, and the trans-combustant air putrifier.
The function of the neotransistometer, I think, is self-explanatory: It oxidizes the laser-field turbine (LFT) and compresses the Polonium intake valve so that the gasohol pistons can achieve millenniary exit velocity. In order for the Hyperloop to reach Mach 0.91 (also known as Eberstark’s Constant, represented as ρ), the LFT’s must super-collide, sublimate and thermosynthesize simultaneously, reaching the electrolytical oxiduction point; with a steady supply of polycarbonate thermite flooded into the rotary dehydration portal, each Hyperloop pod can successfully ignite, elevate, and chromosphere from one terminal to the next, without argifying, de-substantiating or undergoing fyto-photo-interterpidation.
Well, duh! That really was obvious from the name.
The trans-combustant air putrifier, meanwhile, is a bit more complicated.
NOOO! Don’t say it’s so!
You know how typical internal combustion engines tend to Boullify in aneroid environments where the gear ratio is constrained by a manifold vacuum? (We’ve all been there! Lol.) Musk’s plan for the Hyperloop evades this common restraint by applying what’s known as Koppinger’s Conjecture to a colloidal body’s gravitational field strength. As far as I know (correct me in the comments!), this has never been attempted before.
To lay out the problem: When super-cooled heavy air interacts with a hybrid ethlyene glycollagen solution, it tends to convaporize into a corrosive Potassium 2-ethylhexanoate mixture. This means that the rubidium undecamercurides threaten to combolobulate the entire system. And that is ::looks straight into the camera:: a tricky-wicky potato, my good neighbor!
Okay, so maybe a little more complicated.
Also the tracks are made of aluminum or Silicon or some shit, I don’t know.
After more than six long years of argument, debate, protest, lobbying, and court rulings, a bill approving construction of the Keystone XL pipeline is wending its way through the Senate. Once the bill has passed, it will be sent to the president’s desk, where Barack Obama has pledged to veto it, marking only the third time he has chosen to use that constitutional power, and the first time he has done so since 2010.
And also utterly pointless.
The strongest argument against the pipeline is that it will contribute in a significant way to increasing greenhouse gas emissions. The only problem is that everyone knows that the contribution will be negligible — with estimates ranging from 27 million to 110 million additional tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year out of a global total of roughly 40 billion tons. That’s an annual increase of somewhere between .0675 and .275 percent.
That’s right: the high-end estimate predicts that the pipeline will increase global greenhouse emissions by slightly more than one quarter of 1 percent.
But of course, stopping the pipeline would do no such thing. As everyone on both sides of the debate concedes, the Canadians will get their tar sands oil to market one way or the other, whether or not the pipeline is approved and built as proposed. (Rail transport is the most likely alternative.) And that means that rejecting the project will have essentially no impact on global carbon emissions.
And trains don’t contribute to Global Emissions, right? Or risk huge natural disasters and deaths as they pass through our cities and towns, right?
Yet the number of jobs at stake is as negligible as the projected increase in pollutants. Estimates place the number at around 2,000 annual temporary jobs over two years of pipeline construction, followed by 35 permanent positions once it’s up and running.
You heard that right: 35. Two digits; no zeros.
All of this is common knowledge. Pretty much no one on either side of the argument attempts to deny or refute any of it.
And yet here we are at the O.K. Corral, the Senate and president poised for a showdown.
Are you getting excited yet? Feel the drama building and your blood boiling with passion?
Of course, for everyone in the country who isn’t an environmental activist, the hoopla defies comprehension. But hey, that’s the way our politics work now: enormous amounts of time, energy, and resources — and the president’s limited political capital — expended on a ploy to get a special-interest group trained and tested for…some as-yet-undetermined future fight.
Pssssssss – that’s the air going out of the drama balloon. A whole bunch of time, money and energy wasted. Oh wait, we are talking about politicians aren’t we. Just sayin’…